01
Energy baseline
Meter, tariff, equipment, operating-hours, and production-normalized view of the current state.
Industrial energy & automation · Four-week engagement
See the losses. Design the control path.
A site-bounded energy audit and industrial automation assessment that turns operating data into an evidence-ranked opportunity register and an investable innovation roadmap.
$40,000
Fixed scope
4 weeks
Audit to roadmap
Operator-first
Control boundary
Site decision model
Meter & tariff82% mapped
Process loads67% mapped
Control signals54% mapped
Operator context74% mapped
Evidence
Control plan
Illustrative engagement interface. Savings are validated from site data; no outcome is claimed before measurement.
Decision artifacts
What leaves the room at week four.
Not a generic audit PDF. A traceable package your operations, engineering, finance, and leadership teams can interrogate.
02
Opportunity register
Each opportunity carries an evidence source, assumption, dependency, confidence level, and owner.
03
Automation architecture
Signals, controls, historian or MES links, edge/cloud boundary, fail-safe behavior, and operator handoffs.
04
Innovation roadmap
A sequenced four-week decision package: quick wins, validation pilots, capital projects, and measurement plan.
Operating sequence
Four weeks, four decisions.
Weekly working reviews keep assumptions visible and stop the roadmap from becoming a consultant-only artifact.
Baseline the site
Confirm boundaries, ingest bills and operating data, map major loads, and walk the process with operators.
Trace loss and control
Build the energy balance, identify operating variance, and map sensing, control, and data gaps.
Design the interventions
Model opportunities, define automation concepts, and review safety and operator-control boundaries.
Make the roadmap investable
Prioritize by confidence, effort, dependency, and operational value; deliver the decision package.
Relevant delivery evidence
Industrial work surfaces, without invented outcomes.
These are architecture and workflow artifacts from prior industrial delivery. We do not publish savings, uptime, or client-result claims without an attributable measurement record.
Refinery automation architecture
One-way intelligence. Operator authority preserved.
A five-zone refinery concept connecting plant evidence to a governed intelligence layer. Cloud systems could watch, recommend, and advise; no action returned without explicit operator approval.
- ↳ Endpoint and constraint map
- ↳ Operator-approval boundary
- ↳ Pilot milestones and zone architecture
Manufacturing workflow system
From engineering change to line readiness.
A governed hard-tech workflow spanning EBOM-to-MBOM handoff, ECO review, supplier impact, routing release, traveler signoff, and signed audit trails.
- ↳ BOM and routing decision flow
- ↳ Supplier-impact evidence
- ↳ Line-readiness and signed traceability
Safety and operator control
Automation does not erase authority.
Every concept names the human decision owner, safe state, override path, data boundary, failure mode, and validation gate. We do not bypass OEM protections, plant safety systems, or change-control procedures.
Before kickoff
Minimum useful inputs
- 12 months of utility bills where available
- Interval or sub-meter data where available
- Equipment list, ratings, and operating schedules
- Production volumes or another output normalizer
- Site access and an operations or maintenance counterpart
- Known safety, network, and vendor-access constraints
Missing data is not hidden. We label assumptions and define the measurement needed to raise confidence.
Start with the boundary, not a savings promise.
On the first call we confirm the site, decision owner, data availability, operating constraints, and whether the fixed engagement is the right fit.